Trump may have lost but don’t bet Democrats can fix the economy

Analysis Trump may have lost but don’t bet Democrats can fix the economy Eduardo Porter There’s not much they can do over the next couple of years to alleviate angry voters’ stress over prices

It was the economy, again. Although Donald Trump largely ignored it, voters’ acute concerns over the rising cost of living fuelled a political upheaval for the ages that is likely to deliver the biggest swing toward Democrats since Watergate, granting them the largest House majority in nearly four decades alongside their biggest edge in the Senate since 2008.

Still, having come to power promising to restore affordability, the new crop of Democrats are soon to discover that there is not much they can do over the next couple of years to alleviate angry voters’ stress over pricey gas and groceries, exorbitant mortgages and unaffordable healthcare.

Democrats would do well to recall that the affordability strains that helped deliver them to power are not dissimilar to those that delivered the presidency to Trump two years ago. And they could again quickly become their enemy.

“First, Americans want Washington to bring down the cost of living,” said Chuck Schumer, Senate majority leader-in-waiting. Likely House speaker Hakeem Jeffries added that “we’ve promised to fight for an affordable America, and that’s exactly what we will do”. They will soon discover the limits to their power to undo Trump’s economic blunders and steer an economy that is largely driven by forces outside their control.

Take gas prices, the single most powerful motivation for voters’ rebellion against the Republicans enabling Trump’s policy choices. Reining them in will require reaching an understanding with Iran that reopens the strait of Hormuz. Schumer thinks Democrats can achieve that. “We are going to end the war,” he said.

Trump may disagree, however. And while it is true that Congress is legally entitled to end wars – it is the only branch of government entitled to start one – it is unclear what such legal niceties might mean in practice. Republicans have controlled Congress since Trump went to war. Still, he has pursued it without asking for their approval. Democrats could now try to cut war funding, but they do not have the requisite 60 Senate votes to prevent a filibuster.

Trump’s trade war has similar characteristics. When the supreme court struck down Trump’s “national security” tariffs because they exceeded presidential authority, the administration reimposed many of them under a different statute, deploying a new, also spurious rationale. There is also little that Democrats can do to stop Trump’s war on immigration. It is fully funded and can carry on unimpeded, further disrupting construction and other immigrant-reliant industries.